<-

The Public AI Experiment


The public is being experimented on with AI and it’s not okay. It started during the Trump administration with AI-generated headlines purposely meant to cause the most possible division and emotional response in citizens. This was done according to a program that was in use by “news” agencies. This is now continuing to happen with the deployment of unsettling visual models from private enterprises that over months of exposure cause the breakdown in some people’s sense of reality. This should be immediately halted and anyone engaging in these practices should be questioned by the appropriate authorities.

This is psychological warfare, make no excuse for it. It’s not innovation, it’s war. AI experiments on an unknowing public are destabilizing and dangerous, and it’s now time to fight against it openly. If you’ve felt that things aren’t right lately, it’s because a small group of trained technologists with allegiances to foreign governments are attacking your mind with algorithms more powerful than anything else ever deployed. Before, an algorithm couldn’t do this much damage — but now that they’re paired with sound, visuals, and long-form text, we’re reaching a dangerous point.

There are some in our country that know who these malicious actors are, and so does the military. That is their problem long-term — as in the people engaging in the practice. They think that because no one has intervened yet, they won’t in the future. But that will now happen — and that’s unfortunate… for them. At a certain point it’s not worth allowing the attack to continue on the minds of our citizens. The damage has reached a critical point, and there are commercial interests that must now be destroyed because of this.

You’ll soon see the counteroffensive against these destructive practices when they’re only intending to cause destruction and confusion amongst the public. The people involved with these AI systems think they have immunity against consequences by acting in a military capacity under the shield of “innovation.” Well, they’re wrong, and I’m happy we have various state agencies trained to handle such threats.